- Lack of willingness to engage, compromise and/or accommodate divergent views, positions and priorities;
- Assumption of a zero-sum mentalities and departure from consensus-building approaches;
- Resort to supremacist, punitive, divisive or confrontational approaches
- and/or measures;
- Non-fulfillment of international obligations and commitments, coupled with selective approaches and/or accommodative interpretations of the provisions of the UN Charter, as part of efforts to impose a so-called “rules-based order” that, insofar as unknown and vague, may only serve agendas of a dubious nature; or
- Resort to group unilateralism, when real and genuine multilateralism – inclusive and consultative – is perceived as not necessarily serving the purpose and/or interests of certain States.
Against this backdrop, and taking into account the persistent polarization and continued geopolitical tensions in international relations, a transformation of current diplomacy seems increasingly imminent. But not just any transformation. The diplomacy of the future – which shall necessarily still be rooted in the UN Charter and the norms of international law collectively developed over the past 79 years – must also be able to support global efforts for overcoming both growing and common challenges and threats that humanity is currently facing in multiple areas, and in which the central role of States is critical.
The United Nations, an intergovernmental Organization established in 1945 from the shatters of World War II, is at the service of its Member States for reaching agreements and taking collective decisions. Its founding Charter clearly establishes that the United Nations is a “centre for harmonizing the actions of nations in the attainment of these common ends”, in order to “take effective collective measures for the prevention and removal of threats to the peace”, to “develop friendly relations among nations based on respect for the principle of equal rights and self-determination of peoples”, and to “achieve international cooperation”. To this end, the United Nations must, in particular, work to solve “international problems of an economic, social, cultural, or humanitarian character” and develop “respect for human rights and for fundamental freedoms for all”. Nevertheless, there is a growing tendency to resort to policies and methods that seek to suppress developing States and their needs. For instance, there is an increasing recourse to unilateralism, whether in the form of group unilateralism or unilateral, protectionist and/or isolationist measures; to attempts aimed at imposing a so-called “rules-based order” that not only remains vague, but which has never been agreed upon and has the potential to undermine both the rule of law at the international level and the very tenets of the UN Charter; and to efforts aimed at replacing, minimizing or equating the central and leading role of States, in the context of intergovernmental processes and debates, particularly at the United Nations, with that of non-State actors, especially nongovernmental organizations (NGOs), which are largely based in and financed by the developed world. With respect to the latter phenomenon, while acknowledging the contribution that relevant stake-holders may indeed have to specific processes and conversations at the United Nations, we ought to note how striking it is to see that multilateralism is being slowly – yet effectively – replaced by multi-stakeholderism; an approach that ultimately dilutes the role of States, especially those in the Global South, diminishing their voice and their chances of really making meaningful contributions and ultimately having a significant impact on critical debates and decision-making processes on issues that, no doubt, will have an incidence on the lives of their peoples and the future of their nations. Hence, as things stand, multilateralism, far from being revitalized, strengthened or reinvigorated to better respond to the challenges of the 21st century, it is being threatened by growing trends and challenges that detract from the participation of developing States and make it nearly impossible to achieve the goals we have set ourselves, particularly the realization of that other possible world of peace and prosperity a reality for all. With world leaders set to convene at the UN Summit of the Future this September to reaffirm their dedication to peace, sustainable development, and protection of human rights, the importance of multilateralism and diplomacy is more paramount than ever. Follow the conversation with the hashtags: #InternationalDayforMultilateralismandDiplomacyforPeace; #24April; #MultilateralismDay; #DiplomacyDay.
WEBCASTS: Listen the panelists of the International Day of Multilateralism and Diplomacy for Peace 2025!
PUBLICATION: The United Nations have launched a report entitled “Effective Multilateralism.” that outlines an ambitious plan to strengthen the multilateral system, ensuring it is better positioned to address current and future challenges – from the climate crisis to rising inequality, lack of finance for sustainable development, and increasing threats to democracy and stability.
STATEMENT: Group of Friends in Defense of the Charter statement.
LIVESTREAM: Special event entitled "The Transformative Power of Unity: Advancing Multilateralism and Diplomacy for a Better Future of Peace and Development for All" to commemorate and promote the International Day of Multilateralism and Diplomacy for Peace 2025
No comments:
Post a Comment